“What is it?” Reuel inquired, “What do you believe that leaves my master so at odds?” “Your master,” Selene began, “is at odds because he fails to grasp the truth of the nature of the cosmos and chases after fantasy screaming so-called truths at it. Fletcher fails to recognize the truth about the world: it’s growing.” “What?”
“Any child can see that South America fits easily into the African continent,” Selene began, “however, the Pacific continents fit into each other in a similarly perfect scale as well…at least they do on a planet half the size of earth. South America, in fact, does not fit into Africa. Africa must be shrunk 40 percent to do this. Pangaea is impossible—a growing earth is the only way this works. The commonly accepted theory is that of plate tectonics; that is, the continents just slide around the planet but are not actually attached to the planet. Allegedly, earthquakes are caused by these plates bumping into each other. Ha. How many earthquakes do you feel a year? If the plates are so free, they must be flat-out lazy.
“Mountains are not caused by plates pushing into each other. As the earth grows, the outer portion of the crust grows slower than the inner portion causing it to collapse back in on itself. Take North America for instance. Ever wonder why there are mountains on either side of the continent but the Great Plains live up to their name? The Plains have fallen back down as the planet has grown in size. The Appalachian Mountains and the Rocky Mountains are old and eroded whereas the Cascades are the most beautiful in the known portions of our galaxy. Plate Tectonics says this is because the Cascades are young mountains freshly made by the North American Plate eating the Pacific and the “Juan de Fuca,” whoever he is. They are right, the Cascades are young, but not because of Plate Tectonics. They are young because they are part of the most recent expansions.
“Oh sure the ‘scientists’ will say things like ‘the density of the planet if it has grown over time would be so great in the past that the dinosaurs could not have reached the great sizes that they did.’ They also point out that the oceans would have covered everything several miles deep. However, they also admit that the oxygen levels we have today would not have allowed them to live. They assume that the earth has always been as it is and thus they beg the question. Nay, the earth produces more matter. Gravity, if different than today, would have been weaker. That is why the dinosaurs could roam the earth. As for the oxygen levels and the oceans, molecules released from the earth’s core would have created both; Earth used to be much like Mercury or Mars. A thinner atmosphere would have allowed the dinosaurs to live.
“As for the oceans, they were made over time, as I said. Sure, we find marine life fossilized all the time. Where do we find them? On land, that’s where. There would have been water in ancient times, of course, but it would not have been in the form of oceans. Even the ‘scientists’ admit that the ocean floor is no older than 70 million years. The continents are three times that age. This says that the ocean was formed more recently: earth is expanding.”
Conrad piped up, “You kep saying zat, but how does zis expansion hapen?”
“It all has to do with ‘prime matter.’ Prime matter is a substance that cannot be seen or felt or measured or documented in anyway. They are everywhere. They consist of one positron and an electron. The perfect balance of their charges renders them undetectable. However, occasionally the prime matter particle is hit by a piece of energy that makes it turn inside out. Usually it does not amount to anything. However, when it occurs in the plasma core of a planet, or sun, or nebula, or black hole, it is sustained for long enough that five layer of other prime matter lay on top of the new proton that is encased by an electron making a hydrogen atom. Repeated a couple trillion trillion times and the universe is built.”
“Vat about neutrons?” Conrad asked. “There are no Neutrons,” Selene responded. Reuel then questioned, “But moving back to plate tectonics, how is it that you know it’s wrong?”
“Because subduction is wrong. Think about it: they—the ‘scientists’—ask you to believe that a plate, made of rock, is pushed into magma which is twice as dense as solid granite. That makes it impossible, of course, but let’s say it happens anyway. If subduction does happen then the amount of strain for the plates to go under each other should leave the oceans—the primary subduction zone suspects—ragged, but they are smooth and completely lack signs of subduction. If their theory is true and the earth always remains the same size, we would expect the same amount of earth that disappears to reappear elsewhere. However, the mid-ocean ridges are far larger than any ‘subduction zones.’ Finally, in a subduction zone, one plate ‘subducts’ to the other. This would mean that one side should be much, much older than the other. The two sides are always the same age. There is no subduction.
"There is one other thing to keep in mind. When we look at other planets, or even the moon, we can see the expansion marks that we see on the ocean floor. We cannot see plates on the other planets. We have decided that earth is not the center of the universe; earth is not ‘special.’ As such, we cannot treat it differently than the other planets. There is no subduction, only expansion.”
Reuel had one more question, “Why are you so bitter against scientists?” Selene answered, “Because they hide the truth! They are afraid. They are cowards. They hide behind outdated ideas. Their system of physics leaves no room for prime matter and must be reworked. They even believe in gravity when it is an electromagnetic field that keeps celestial bodies in their paths.” “You don’t believe in gravity?” Reuel wondered, but Conrad said, “It’s time for us to go.”
